Places to go

Paul's admin links

  • Local pages

  • Categories

  • Quote of the year

    If you write for God you will reach many men and bring them joy. If you write for men you may make some money and you may give someone a little joy and you may make a noise in the world, for a little while. If you write only for yourself you can read what you yourself have written and after ten minutes you will be so disgusted you will wish that you were dead.

    - Thomas Merton, from New Seeds of Contemplation

  • Acknowledgement

    Image of Saturn (tbsp) and Rhea courtesy NASA/JPL

    Quick! Gird up your loins! Defend the faith! Ok, but I have a few questions first

    A jaunty scene of one of the Church’s crusades in which it “defended itself” against the Muslims. If you know who painted this, or if its copyright is expired, or anything else about it, please let me know. In the meantime, click on the image for a really great post about Christian-Muslim relations at shrinkthechurch.com

    I just spent an enlightening half-hour googling “defend the faith” in conjunction with certain names: Del Tackett, Chuck Colson, Norman Geisler, James Dobson, Os Guinness, Ravi Zacharias, Jerry Falwell, Ken Ham. A number of these guys are leaders in what is apparently called the “Christian Worldview” or “Biblical Worldview” movement. I can’t say I’m too impressed with them. I sat through a course based on Del Tackett’s Truth Project once and it was not fun. The Truth Project — the name alone should set off alarms — presumes to cover all branches of knowledge in 12 sessions and to instruct its students in how to think “biblically” about things like science, literature, modern art, politics, and philosophy. As a scientist, watching the DVDs was an exercise in frustration because Dobson’s Focus on the Family, which is responsible for the Truth Project, has attached itself to the Intelligent Design movement. The whole project is pseudo-intellectual and is directed toward folks who want to be able to defend the faith and stay true to “biblical values.” But the most troubling thing about the entire course was that Tackett et al. constantly divided the world into Us and Them. Over and over, it was assumed that there is us, the Christians, inside some kind of circle of faith (the Church, perhaps), and them, the bad guys, the others, the threat, outside. Lines were very clear. I get the feeling that this binary way of thinking is a hallmark of the “Biblical Worldview” approach. In the 30 minutes I spent online I discovered an interesting range of things against which Christians should defend the faith. They are, in no particular order: militant atheism, “a resurgent Islam,” Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, homosexuality, secular humanism, Hollywood, evolution, the big bang theory, abstract art (?), Oprah Winfrey, liberals, university professors, relativism, mystical religions (wow!), Obama, environmentalists, metaphorical readings of scripture. This is just from my memory; there were certainly more.

    The evil is out there. Not in here.

    You see it on larger scales too. And I may be just making this up, I may be wrong, etc., but I have a theory. In the late 1980s the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War ended, along with the nightmare vision of global nuclear war. Between the dates of 9 November 1989 (fall of the Berlin Wall) and 11 September 2001 (you know what), we had to have someplace to focus our anxiety, and it was during this time that movies like Armageddon and Deep Impact were made, movies about worldwide disaster in the form of large-scale meteorite impacts. Now we have nuclear-armed terrorists to worry about, so there are no more global-death-from-outer-space movies. Our anxiety is innate, is my point, and it must have an object, and that object is out there. The thought is, we have nothing to do with all this death. It is not us: it’s the Reds, or the big rocks from space, or the terrorists.

    This is not your father’s inner Solar System. Green dots represent objects which do not approach the Earth at present e.g. Main Belt asteroids; Yellow dots represent objects which approach the Earth but do not cross its orbit e.g. Amor asteroids; Red dots represent objects which cross the Earth’s orbit e.g. Aten and Apollo asteroids. Click on image for a closer look. Before you get too worried about immanent death from space, though, read the second paragraph of Todd’s comment. He’s right about the misleading appearance of this map. Source: Armagh Observatory

    People are probably right to fear the rocks from space. We actually didn’t have much to do with their existence, and they pose a legitimate threat to the planet. They have certainly left some marks in the past and will assuredly do so in the future if nothing is done to stop them. Here is a nice searchable list of Near Earth Asteroids, and here is another of Potentially Hazardous Asteroids, a superset of the former. Currently the best candidate for impact is Asteroid 1999 AN10, which could come within about 13,000 miles from the surface of the Earth on August 7, 2027. This is really, really close on the scale of the Solar System; it’s only about 5% of the Earth-Moon distance. This asteroid is found on yet another list of so-called Very Close Approaches from the years 1800-2200. All these possible sources of worldwide pandemonium may make you nervous, but I’m not too worked up about them. I have a strange kind of faith that most serious scientific/technical problems can be solved.

    But I’m not so confident about our chances of solving those other problems, you know, the non-scientific/technical ones. Like the Buddhists, the homosexuals, and Oprah. I’m pretty sure that these threats will remain and probably even increase. Even blatant atheism is on the rise. What is a good (or even not-so-good) Christian to do? What many Christians will do, I’m afraid, is keep insisting that these people are the enemy. Churchgoers will keep defending the faith from these folks and forget about the single largest threat to the Church: the Church itself. It is far, far easier to see the shortcomings of others than it is to see our own. And it is far easier to point at others than it is to look deeply into the darkness of our own souls.

    It is a commonplace that the Church comes across to nonmembers as irrelevant and out-of-touch with the world we live in. These crimes are forgivable, because I think it’s part of the Church’s role to conserve our Christian traditions and there is a fine line between tradition and convention. It’s easy for good people to confuse these. So I can see how we can seem, at times, quaint and naive. But I tell you, I have spent the last twelve years in two different Protestant churches and the behavior in these places is the sorriest I have ever seen. How can we love the world if we hate each other? It just can’t be done. No wonder people are leaving organized Christianity at such an alarming rate. Can you blame them? Meanwhile, what  are many Christians bothered about? Gay people! Hindus! People who make abstract art!

    So I say to churches and individuals: We must look to ourselves first. Jesus said, Why do you see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? Or how can you say to your neighbor, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbor’s eye (Matt. 7.3-5). We are the enemy, fellow Christians. Let’s remove those labels we’ve affixed to everyone who’s not like us and discover our common roots. They are deep. Labels, you see, are helpful in science — including work on killer asteroids — but are not so helpful in when it comes to loving the world. Love does not categorize, wrote Irma Zaleski.

    Let’s stop throwing stones at the world and begin reconciling ourselves to it. And speaking of flying stones, remember to support your local astronomer. She could save the world one day.

    Comment Pages

    There are 4 Comments to "Quick! Gird up your loins! Defend the faith! Ok, but I have a few questions first"

    • Todd says:

      Nice post, and just as true of those of us who are not Christians as it is of Christians. It’s a natural human tendency to want to form “teams.” My team against your team, etc. In sports this is (usually) harmless. I mean, I might say “I hate the Yankees” but all that really means is that I want them to lose baseball games. I don’t wish any harm on any of them. But in many other areas of life the whole “my team” concept can really be a problem. It is only when we perceive (or imagine) a threat from “outer space” that we seem to even consider the possibility that we might all be on the same team.

      By the way, I’d like to point out that the asteroid chart is misleading to the untrained viewer. The dots representing the asteroids are WAY bigger than they should be. I know there is a good reason for this: if you showed the asteroids to scale, you wouldn’t be able to see them. Heck, you could hardly see the PLANETS! But to someone who doesn’t already know this, the chart gives the impression that the inner solar system is practically filled with asteroids. But, as you know, it is mostly just empty.

         0 likes

    • Cedric Lazlo says:

      consarn you Paul Wallace with your thought provoking blog posts that make me use my brain on a summers morn.

      i’m not sure that i can agree more with what you, and Todd, have said. aside from the good and natural desire for the Yankees to lose all of their games while their players come to no physical harm, i think that this “us versus them” thing is really getting us into a pile of trouble all over the place. i’ve read the Bible and i don’t recall Jesus talking much about meteors or asteroids or green blooded aliens with death rays from distant planets, but i do remember something about how we should love each other as we love ourselves and even how we should love each other as he loved us. and while this is sometimes a difficult thing to put into practice (like with Yankees fans) it also seems like a pretty easy thing to understand.

      maybe Rodney King had it right when he exclaimed “Why can’t we all just get along?” ?

         0 likes

    • Keith says:

      I too am with you (and Cedric) (and Todd). Indeed, I’m pretty sure Jesus spent more of his harsh words on believers (Pharisees, his own followers, etc.) than on those people who so upset James Dobson. Jesus regularly found himself correcting people who were so sure they knew what he would want done, and in 2000 years we have gotten no better at that. This passionate need to be against something is behind much of what makes the Church hard to love sometimes.

      Your concern about the likely increase of Oprah may be well-founded, too.

         0 likes

    • OC says:

      Not to get into a long debate, but just as the theological-right pulls a scripture from here or there to justify there beliefs, so does the theological-left.

      I often read “judge not, lest ye be judged” and “love your neighbor as yourself” and I could not agree with them more. I also read “go and sin no more” and “I am the way, the truth and the life. No man comes to the Father, but by me” and “in the world but not of the world”.

      There are decisions, philosophies and lifestyles that run counter to what Christianity teaches. Yet, we as Christians are told we should listen to those outside the church as they tell us how we should live out our beliefs.

      I 100% agree with the premise that individuals, be they Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, homosexuals, republicans, democrats, etc., are not our enemy. As a matter of fact, scripture even says so, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood…”. That does not mean, however, that we are to sit quietly on our hands and allow our worldview to be guided by what the world teaches, rather than what Christ himself taught.

      I’ve found that we are all comfortable with the God who looks most like us.

         0 likes